After signature on the source chain, a transfer enters confirmation monitoring. Once required confidence thresholds are reached, the execution layer continues the route toward destination settlement.
We expose lifecycle states as submitted, processing, and completed. This model keeps both user interfaces and partner systems synchronized without overloading users with low-level transaction details.
During processing, route health is still monitored. If chain conditions degrade, the system can adapt execution parameters to preserve settlement reliability while minimizing user-visible disruption.
Final completion is posted only after destination-side criteria are met. This avoids premature "success" signaling and keeps accounting systems aligned with real settlement outcomes.
Strong lifecycle semantics are as important as routing speed. Clear status transitions reduce support tickets, lower uncertainty, and create better trust around cross-chain transfers.